Next entry:
Fad! »

You may consider shenanigans called

How can you make a movie version of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire without Percy Weasley? I love that dirty rotten slimeball, but I could accept them cutting him out of Prisoner of Azkaban. Sometimes when you make a movie, things have to go and Percy wasn't really vital to the plot.

But Percy is very important to Goblet of Fire. He's Barty Crouch's mouthpiece when he's missing! Percy is also very important to the fifth book, but if we jump from Chamber of Secrets to Order of the Phoenix, we will be seriously lacking in character development. He will be a stranger to the movie-going audience!

Poo to you, moviemakers. Poo to you with knobs on.

srah - Monday, 22 November 2004 - 7:22 PM
Tags: , ,

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.srah.net/mt421/mt-pings.cgi/3544


Comments (1)

gravatar Lori - November 23, 2004 - 6:11 AM -

I agree- I was surprisingly offended to learn he has been cut from GoF, when he hasn't really mattered to me before, but he's obviously v. important in Goblet of Fire. grrr. (looks up, smacks forehead...finally realizes extend of self-nerdiness)

Blog Directory - Blogged